September 2, 2010

Getting Acquired By and Working at Yahoo!

Yahoo! Times Square

Yahoo! Times SquareAfter finishing over three years at Yahoo! and almost 3 years previous to that at Right Media, I thought it’d be worthwhile to write about my experience over that very interesting time and set of events.

This is simply my perspective as I know that others at Right Media and Yahoo! had completely different opinions and feelings about everything that occurred from 2004-2010. That being said, let’s take a walk down memory lane.

Joining Right Media

In late 2004 when my longtime friend Brian O’Kelley (currently CEO of AppNexus) reached out to me to see if I wanted to join a startup called Right Media. Brian was the CTO of Right Media and had built some interesting auction technology for their ad server. They wanted to start going more aggressively after publishers and he thought I’d be able to help with that effort.

Business Plan Pro from Palo Alto SoftwareI had a good job I enjoyed at Palo Alto Software, a Eugene-based business that is the leader in the business planning software space. I had worked there for four years and was managing a small team running their ecommerce site PaloAlto.com, as well as their main content properties Bplans.com and Mplans.com. In my spare time at night, I also was operating a site I started in 1997 called Wakeboarder.com that I later sold in 2006.

Despite the good job, I wanted the opportunity to join a younger startup and online advertising was a field that I had good experience in and was passionate about. My role was to do business development, product, and support work for medium to small publishers for Right Media’s ad network. Additionally, I looked forward to working with Brian again as we had started our first web business together in 1995 and worked together numerous times since (including a fun dot-com bomb in 1999).

Right Media was a New York company, but when I joined I made it clear I had no plans to move from Eugene. Fortunately, Brian and the rest of the executive team (Michael Walrath, CEO and Christine Hunsicker, COO) allowed me to start building a publisher-focused team in Eugene. When I joined my wife was excited for me to be able to work from home since we had recently had our 2nd child. However, after a month I had already hired three great people and found office space. It was off to the races.

Right Media Growth

Right Media LogoWhen I joined, Right Media was an ad network with some interesting and differentiated auction technology that helped power the network. It had not yet become an ad exchange, but the ad network itself was growing well. I helped build Right Media’s self-service publisher signup, and we began bringing in publishers at a steady clip. it’s funny now to think back to 2005 and how we were talking to publishers like “TheFacebook.com” which was at the time a few young college kids who didn’t know much about advertising for their college social network.

Not too long after getting the office space setup in Eugene the company started making the move to the crazy concept of an ad exchange. We had to go sell other ad networks who were our competitors to use the Right Media Exchange as their ad server or as an additional place to access supply and demand. It was a strange notion to many people externally, but it made a lot of sense to everyone within the company. Even then we didn’t know what would happen when we connected our ad network to another ad network to see how the buying and selling would perform on one platform. Fortunately, it worked quite well.

Right Media Eugene Office Door

The Eugene Office Entrance

The team in Eugene kept growing as we brought on engineers, account managers, and product managers to help support the publisher and ad network pieces of the exchange. The whole company was growing as well, but we were a startup within a startup. A bit of a strange concept, but we communicated with the team in New York well and I spent a fair share of time traveling to New York along with trips on the West Coast to meet with clients and attend conferences.

The time during 2005-2007 was amazing as every month saw growth and progress in the business. The Exchange continued to grow, improve in quality, and it started making real waves within the online advertising industry. We felt like underdogs taking on the establishment to change the industry, which is one of those things that makes startups so much fun and addicting to many people.

There were problems with quality, hiccups with the exchange scaling, and problems with spyware and other issues that the company took very seriously and worked through diligently. I think those things really kept us on our toes and kept us so busy that you really couldn’t stop and marvel at the fact that we were doing billions of impressions per day by the time 2007 hit.

During 2006 though our team in Eugene had noticed that small to medium publishers were having a tough time working with the complexity of the Right Media Exchange. We used the APIs to build RMX Direct which was later renamed to Direct Media Exchange.

This product was the first self-service publisher yield optimizer that was a simple ad server that allowed publishers to get demand from the Exchange while also managing and auctioning their inventory to 3rd party ad networks like Google Adsense, Valueclick, and others. This was a forefather to the products later built by companies like Pubmatic, the Rubicon Project, and AdMeld.

Direct Media Exchange also was experiencing the same kind of rapid growth and success of the Right Media Exchange, but at a smaller scale that was a bit more under the radar. The team in Eugene was pretty proud of what we’d built together.

Pre-Acquisition

My first personal experience with Yahoo! directly came in 2006 during Ad Tech San Francisco. At about 10 am on the first day, Brian told me that he had a meeting scheduled with Yahoo! down in Sunnyvale that afternoon that he could no longer make due to an important meeting at Ad Tech. He suggested I go along with Ant Taylor and Kees Schouten who were both at Ad Tech as well. What was interesting about this was that Ant and Kees were actually in their first week on the job at Right Media and didn’t even really know what their roles were yet. Additionally, I had no context for the meeting besides that “we are talking to Yahoo! about becoming a client.”

We headed down to Sunnyvale and met with Ryan Christensen, who was doing Pricing and Yield Management for Yahoo!’s display business. We managed to get through the meeting even though we lacked context and really spent most of the time learning about how Yahoo! was currently running their non-guaranteed business and talking about how Right Media’s Exchange could help with some of those problems.

Later that summer I was in New York when a group from Yahoo! came to meet with the Right Media executive team. The morning of the meeting, Ant and I were tasked with building a presentation for one portion of the meeting. As a great example of the hectic pace of the startup world, we again lacked context and tried to scrap our way through it anyway. As you’d expect, we created a terrible presentation that wasn’t usable for the meeting. The meeting apparently went well, but the panic I felt that morning was something I’ll never forget.

Yahoo and Right MediaIn October of of 2006 things really started to get more real as Yahoo! invested $40 million into Right Media for 20% of the company and to become a major client of the Exchange. This was a huge win both from a company stability perspective financially, but it also provided a marquee quality client who validated the Exchange in the eyes of the industry.

Of course, there were feelings internally and rumors abound through the rest of 2006 and early 2007 that Yahoo! might want the whole company. As visitors from Yahoo! became more frequent to the offices in 2007, it was a not so subtle secret they were doing due diligence and diving deeper on our technology.

After spending Monday through Thursday at a conference my flighted landed in Eugene and I received a call from Christine Hunsicker our COO. She said I needed to be in New York by 9:00 am the following morning to demo Direct Media Exchange to people from Yahoo! and to bring along our lead product manager and lead engineer for the product. I told her this would be tough as I hadn’t been home all week and it was already Thursday afternoon. She said she wasn’t asking if I could do it or not, so we drove the two hours to Portland to take a red eye to New York.

We flew all night, changed in the bathroom at JFK, and then made it to the Right Media offices a bit late. The three of us walked into the main Right Media conference room where there was a few Right Media executives and then a number of executives from Yahoo!. At the time I wasn’t familiar with any of the Yahoo! executives as it was my first time meeting them, but it was a pretty high-powered tech crowd in the room consisting of SVP of Product Mark Morrissey, SVP of Engineering David Ku, Chief Scientist Qi Lu (now the President of Online Services at Microsoft), VP of Product John Slade, and halfway through the meeting Jerry Yang also made an appearance.

We were asked to demo Direct Media Exchange so we connected our product manager’s laptop to the projector. Remember, this was after a night of travel and no sleep. As the demo begins, the first thing everyone notices is his Firefox toolbar is set to Google as the default search engine. Oops, strike one!

After some half-joking and half-serious comments about the toolbar, I gave an introduction to the product and ask our product manager to login to the application. He then clicked on the username form field and hesitated. I wasn’t sure why he was doing so, but he gave me a look that let me know something was wrong. I urged him to proceed, and he typed in a Gmail address to login to the application. Apparently it was the only address he had with administrative priviledges. Oops, strike two!

We endured some more jokes that were increasingly serious, but then continued to give a quality demo of the application with plenty of good dialog. I thought we’d moved past the early mistakes when we were asked whether we were building a specific future enhancement. Our product manager responded “Absolutely, I’ve already created some mockups I can show you.” I wanted to bang my head on the desk at that point, as I knew what was coming and he opened up mockups that he’d recently created in MS Paint. That’s right, they were screenshots of our app with hand-drawn new features scribbled on it. A true professional mockup! Strike three?

Fortunately, the strength of what we’d built and the traction we’d achieved with Direct Media Exchange in the demo was what ended up hopefully being memorable. The company overall ended up being a compelling option for Yahoo! after Google had just ponied up $3.1 billion for DoubleClick just a few weeks earlier. Yahoo! purchased the remaining 80% of Right Media it didn’t already own for $680M making it one of the largest ad technology acquisitions of all time.

The Acquisition

Yahoo! AcquisitionGetting acquired is an extremely interesting experience. Of course the team celebrated, as it was a large acquisition and it really validates what you’ve been working so hard on. This was the goal right? Or at least one of the big goals?

On one hand you are happy knowing that your company’s stock is now liquid, and you have the hope of the business becoming even bigger and achieving more success with the “endless” resources of the acquiring company. It was also exciting to go work for one of the pioneers of the web who had big businesses in so many areas online.

However, even having never been through an acquisition, I knew many things were going to change. Immediately the people in our Eugene office began to wonder what would happen to them and if our Eugene office would be closed. At this point we had over 30 employees in our Eugene office but people wondered if they’d have new managers, if they’d be laid off, and what would happen to the products they were working on.

The acquisition process and integration itself for me personally was good. It could have been improved probably with more structured education on Yahoo!’s businesses and such, but I felt very welcomed by employees at Yahoo!, and got to immediately start spending time in various Yahoo! offices teaching people about Right Media and what we did.

On my first trip to the Burbank office a group of employees I had just met invited me with them to an Anaheim Might Ducks playoff hockey game. It was a good experience to get to know them personally and see my first live hockey game at the same time.

Moving to their IT systems and and way of working was also pretty easy, but there were still challenging questions the companies had to work through. What would happen to the Right Media brand? Do we integrate websites? What do we switch to Yahoo! technology and what don’t we? Can we still use Google Analytics to track our sites? Most of these things got resolved over time without too much trouble.

Post-Acquisition

After the honeymoon period was over more challenges began to pop up. Specifically, there were strategic questions that showed everyone was not perfectly aligned on where everything was headed and how it should be built. Should we build on top of the existing Right Media technology? Should we start and build a new ad platform from scratch that has the functionality of Right Media combined with the guaranteed ad serving system Yahoo! had built in house?

After the decision was made to build a new platform from scratch (APT) there were then issues trying to keep building Right Media Exchange functionality as many engineers had been moved to work on the new project. Additionally, many engineers had to work on scaling Right Media itself with all of Yahoo!’s added volume and integrating with Yahoo!’s finance systems. This left little room in the road map to keep pushing Right Media as hard as many of us had hoped.

Despite this, there was a lot of excitement over the new system being built and the strategies to do some amazing thing in the display advertising space.

Personally, I had been promoted and was excited about taking on responsibilities at Yahoo! that also went outside of Right Media. It was interesting to learn about new areas of Yahoo!’s business and work with so many new people within the company. I’ve heard other acquisition stories where people from acquired companies were buried in the bigger organization and not given prominent roles. Yahoo! definitely gave various people at Right Media strong roles within the company, although there are definitely people who did get stuck in unfortunate situations.

Microsoft Acquisition Attempt

MicrohooNot too long after getting settled in at Yahoo!, Terry Semel was replaced with Jerry Yang as the CEO and Microsoft went public with their acquisition offer. This was a very interesting time to say the least. It was a rapid ascent to being a startup striving for attention every day to having Yahoo! on every news site all day long with rumors and speculation about the Microsoft acquisition. People tried to not make it a distraction, but I think everyone would be lying if they said there wasn’t a lot of time spent reading that speculation online every day and talking casually around the offices about the situation. For the most part it seemed like most projects kept their momentum as everyone knew that it was a long way from happening for sure.

Everyone I talked to internally loved the idea of locking in a stock price in the $30s, but no one was very excited about having to integrate two companies of that size with different cultures and missions. I felt the same way, and was wondering what would happen to Right Media in the situation of an acquisition.

Of course, it all fell apart. It was followed by the attempted search deal with Google and it ended Jerry’s time at CEO. In retrospect based on the stock price alone you’d have to classify that it was a mistake for Yahoo! to not take one of the Microsoft offers. However, Yahoo! is still a profitable independent company today which I’d say is better for the overall health of the web than if the acquisition had been successful.

Besides the Microsoft acquisition, Yahoo!’s display strategy was also affected by the economy going into the recession. A lot of the ideas around building guaranteed cross-selling relationships for display didn’t make a ton of sense when every publisher was struggling to sell their own inventory alone. This turned a lot of the development of the APT platform to be on building it internally for Yahoo! while continuing to support the Newspaper Consortium who was using the product to run their display ad businesses and sell Yahoo!’s inventory to local advertisers.

The soured economy led to two rounds of layoffs as well. Laying off members of my team and seeing former Right Media employees in Eugene was definitely the lowest point at Yahoo!. Some of the decisions on who to layoff just didn’t seem to make any sense, although struggling to figure it out has never gotten me anywhere. That being said, the company definitely felt overstaffed to me at the time, so it seemed like layoffs did make sense for Yahoo! overall.

The New Yahoo!

YahooQ New Branding CampaignAfter all that drama, Carol Bartz was brought in as CEO and began to make changes throughout the company. Carol did a nice job shutting down certain products and businesses, selling some pieces of Yahoo!, and the change brought some executive turnover and org structure changes.

Unfortunately, one of those products that got shuttered was Direct Media Exchange. While it was sad for our team in Eugene who built it, the reality was that the code hadn’t been touched since the Right Media acquisition. The product had continued to grow and was doing over 20 billion impressions a month and was easily profitable since there was only a small team doing customer support for it. I was a believer though in the company’s mission to focus, and smaller publishers were not a priority of the company as also demonstrated by the shutting down of the Yahoo! Publisher Network product for small publishers.

The major area though that Carol “outsourced” was the search technology business to Microsoft. This became a huge strategic focus for the company and I took the opportunity to move completely out of the Exchange area into B2B Marketing to run the marketing for the Search Alliance with Microsoft. It was a nice change of pace to work on search, work with Microsoft directly, and to work with a new group within Yahoo!.

During this period our office in Eugene was closed as our lease ran out and we were down from 30+ employees to 7 after the two rounds of layoffs, people moving to other Yahoo! offices, or leaving for other job opportunities altogether.

It became clear to me over this time though that I was getting the entrepreneurial itch again and I wanted to get back to building products. One of nice things about a big company is there are specialists to perform almost every task, but I felt more and more like I spent my whole day just talking to people internally while doing status reports and internal presentations. While there is some value in that, it feels like I was disconnected from products and customers. I could have explored moving into other parts of Yahoo!, but I really wanted to start a company and get back to being an entrepreneur.

Overall

The bottom line was the whole thing was a positive experience for me. I’m glad Brian initially recruited me into it and that the Right Media executive team was supportive of building a presence in Eugene.

It’s interesting though is how perspectives can differ, because I know some people at Right Media felt the acquisition was a very negative experience for them. For me though it was positive to have Right Media stock become liquid, I was exposed to many things I never would have learned in a startup or small company, and I got to have front row seats to some very interesting things happening in technology. The best part really may have been many of the friends I made along the way, many of whom I’m sure I’ll work with again. Not a bad way at all to spend the early part of my 30s.

I wish the ending would have turned out different for Direct Media Exchange, and I wish the momentum of the Right Media Exchange wouldn’t have slowed down. As I was leaving Yahoo! though, it appeared that more emphasis was being put back on that business so hopefully that continues that way.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Six Items to Consider When Choosing Your Name and Domain Name

From NatalieMaynor on Flickr

From NatalieMaynor on Flickr

What’s in a name and domain name? Enough that it can mean the difference between success and failure. However, it can also not matter at all, but why would companies put themselves behind the 8-ball with a bad name and domain name right off the bat?

Recently I’d been working through a lot of different startup ideas so naming and available domain names has been on my mind. I stumbled across a question at Quora (fantastic site) that asked what characteristics should someone look at when choosing a domain name for a new business. I answered the question there, but also thought I’d share it here on Conversion Rater.

1. Logic
Does the name make sense for your product or business? Obviously this isn’t a hard and fast rule as there are exceptions of companies with strange names that are unrelated to their actual business that have succeeded such as delicious, flickr, etc. Additionally, there are some names that very loosely related such as Google (math) and Yahoo (feeling of excitement), but are still basically nonsense words.

2. Length
The shorter the better, but don’t be so focused on length that you change it a bizarre name that doesn’t make sense like frtb.com. Additionally, a one word name is usually easier/better than two or three word name.

3. Spelling
Once again there are examples of companies with misspelled names that have succeeded (Digg, Flickr), but why add this additional hurdle? How many people hear about Digg and Flickr from a friend and go type in dig.com or flicker.com? That’s lost traffic you may never get back.

4. Domain extensions
You’ll also want to try and acquire as many of the other domain extensions besides .com. These include .net, .org, .info, .biz, .ws, .me., .io, .us, and if you are going to be global and have sites in other countries you should consider those as well. If you can’t acquire the .com, I’d recommend finding a name where you can find it instead. Once again, there are a few examples of companies like del.icio.us that managed to succeed, but note that they did buy the domain name delicious.com when they had enough money to pay the price later on.

5. Ability to pivot
Many companies end up changing their business model dramatically during their life. If your name is too specific to one particular model, it may constrain you from pivoting to the right model later on.

6. Don’t be too generic
All the above advice would seem to point people to a simple one word name. While this can be great if you can secure such a domain name and also not have trademark issues, there can be a downside to your name not having any personality or not being memorable if it’s too boring. Luckily, unless you’re willing to write a huge check to acquire a short one word name, you’ll have to compromise on one of the categories above.

The bottom line is that naming is tricky without having to worry about a domain name as well. Combine the two of them, and you’ve got a difficult challenge that requires significant thought and research.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Foursquare Is Going To Keep Rolling

It’s funny how early adoption works and how you start to see recurring patterns. When I started using Twitter there were numerous people who questioned what it was, why it was useful, and mocked it. A couple of years later, Twitter is still on a tear.

I’m seeing the same thing with Foursquare today. Early adopters are using it, it’s starting to spread, and once again people I know are confused by it, think it’s useless, and that it has no real business.
[Read more...]

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tynt Is A Cool Specialized Analytic Service

John Battelle’s recent post as well as an email from a friend turned me to Tynt. John goes into a bunch of detail that I won’t repeat here, but essentially what Tynt does is tracks what people are copying and pasting from your site’s content while also adding an attribution link to your site when they do so.
[Read more...]

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Loving the Citizen Sports Acquisition

My employer Yahoo! announced the acquisition of Citizen Sports yesterday. As an avid user of their iPhone application Sportacular, I can personally attest that get social and sports really well, and it’ll be interesting to see what they do hooked into the #1 sports destination on the web in Yahoo! Sports.
[Read more...]

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Pinch Media Launches With Funding

Congratulations to former Right Media and Yahoo! colleagues Greg Yardley and Jesse Rohland who have announced an investment in their new company Pinch Media from a strong group of investors.
[Read more...]

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Web Business Lessons Learned From a Basketball Player

porter.jpg

porter.jpgIn honor of my team advancing from the Sweet 16 of the NCAA Tournament to the Elite 8 to take on defending national champion Florida, I thought I’d tell the story of Tajuan Porter and see what we can learn from it as it relates to running a web business.

Tajuan Porter is a 5-foot 6-inch freshman who plays for the Oregon Ducks. This is obscenely short for college basketball standards, as there are only a couple of players in the entire country who are that small, and they usually don’t have much success.

Porter was successful in high school, but college coaches who saw him chose not to offer him scholarships due to his height and figured he couldn’t succeed at the high college level. Ernie Kent, coach of the Oregon Ducks, saw something special in Porter and was the only major-conference school to offer him a scholarship. Oregon fans and players figured Porter was a backup plan who wouldn’t make much of an impact at Oregon.

When thinking about starting a website or blog, you may have something that’s standing in the way of your success. Perhaps it’s not knowing much about the web, perhaps it’s a lack of time, perhaps it’s a lack of money to get it started, perhaps it’s a lack of technology skill, or perhaps people just think you’re crazy. Your friends, coworkers, or family may be saying things about you like people were saying about Porter. That you just can’t get it done for whatever reason. Are you going to let people be right? Or are you going to focus on improving in every area you can to get it done?

When Porter arrived in the summer before basketball season tipped off, the players saw Porter and like everyone else figured his height would keep him from succeeding.

What players, fans, and other college coaches didn’t realize was that instead of letting people tell Porter what he couldn’t do because of his size, he chose not to dwell on what he couldn’t change and instead develop skills and abilities that would allow him to actually succeed.

Porter started the first game of the year for the Ducks, and scored 28 pts, an amazing amount for a freshman in his first college game. Many thought it was a fluke until in the next two games he scored 27 pts and then set an Oregon freshman record by scoring 38 pts and hitting 10 three-point shots.

You’d think everyone would have immediately started to believe in Porter at this point. But again, people pointed out that the teams Oregon was playing weren’t very good, and that Porter was just lucky that weekend.

Sure enough, Porter cooled off after injurying his toe but continued to play with the pain. He had some games where he didn’t play that well, and fans and local media began to question his defense and wonder if he was hurting the team by being out on the floor if he wasn’t scoring like he was before.

Some websites and blogs get off to a great start like Porter did, but then hit a down period where the buzz cools off and time gets tough. People start to question whether you can do it, whether you’re on the right path, and if you can make it happen. Businesses don’t just rise on a steady growth path. There are peaks and valleys, and the valleys may really test you.

As the end of the regular season came around Porter got over his injury and started scoring and playing like he did at the beginning of the year. He was the MVP of the Pac-10 tournament the Ducks won. Now in the NCAA tournament he shot the Ducks through the 2nd round by hitting 4 three-ponit shots in the 2nd half, and then followed it up by tying a record with hitting 8 three-point shots and scoring 33 pts against UNLV to advance to the Elite 8. Now he’s not only playing well, he’s totally overcome his height disadvantage and is simply dominating the competition. The reward? He now gets to play defending champion Florida to go to the Final Four. How is Porter going to react going up against possibly the best team in the country on the biggest stage?

The comparison for a web business is that when you do fight through your weaknesses and achieve solid to great success, sometimes your reward is that you get to take on the big dog, such as Google, or Yahoo, or Microsoft. Or on a smaller level, once your blog achieves great success in your niche, perhaps you’re now competing with the biggest blog in your space. You may feel like it’s a battle that can’t be won. Are you going to give up?

Really, it’s a classic story, but it’s one of the reasons I enjoy the entertainment and stories in sports. You get to witness how people react in various situations, and Porter’s story has been fun and motivating to follow. The 5-6 underdog has used his weakness to grow his skills in other areas and build up such a strong heart and build his confidence to the point of playing like one of the best in the country. It doesn’t seem possible, but he’s doing it. Congratulations Porter, and let’s hope that we can all fight through the weaknesses in our websites and blogs to become big successes as well.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Business 2.0 Releases the Next Net 25

Business 2.0 Magazine just released their 2nd annual hit article the Next Net 25. Featured in this year’s Net 25 are some of the darlings of the blog and new media world this year:

Social Media
StumbleUpon
Bebo
Meebo
Slide
Wikia

Video
Joost
Blip.tv
Dabble
Metacafe
Revision3

Mobile
Fon
Loopt
Mobio
Soonr
Tiny Pictures

Advertising
Turn
Adify
AdMob
Spot Runner
ViTrue

Enterprise
SuccessFactors
Rearden Commerce
Janrain
Logoworks
SimulScribe

I admittedly don’t know a ton about the mobile and enterprise companies on the list, but I’m not too surprised by any of the other ones. I think there are some very good companies missing, but when you’re cutting a list to 25 with multiple categories, it can be tough to get everybody worthwhile in there.

Last year’s list is doing pretty well, as Google itself bought YouTube, Jotspot, and Writely, and many of the other companies like Digg and Last.fm are doing really well.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

VoFiles.com December Stats Update

vofilesdec.jpg

I’m a bit late on the update, but here’s a wrap up for the month of December for our advertising case study project VoFiles.com. You can also read more about how we set up our initial advertising strategy.

December was the first full month of VoFiles and it started out well as we told some initial friends and coworkers to check it out, and did about an hour’s worth of work with some initial submission of Myspace profiles one night. Traffic really died down though as we moved towards the holidays and didn’t do anything, and the initial momentum didn’t seem to sustain itself. Thus implying that we don’t have the site right yet for social network users to really see any purpose or value in submitting profiles or having people vote for their own.

We did see VoFiles.com start to appear in some search rankings towards the end of the month as we made it into some regular Google results and Google Blog Search results for search terms such as:

  • mitchy the kid
  • the best profile layouts
  • christine dolce
  • tummy sticks
  • vofiles
  • speedini
  • ray lamontagne
  • marc broussard voice
  • dear lord baby jesus
  • christmas profile

I’m not really sure on whether to be happy about those results, shocked, or just confused. I’ll just go ahead and say that January’s terms are even more special.

Overall, the message was clear though that if we want this site to grow and sustain on it’s own, we have to adjust some things to get social networking users to see more value in using it, and get more link popularity to do better with search results for it to grow. Now on to the overall December results.

DECEMBER STATS
User Accounts: 22
Visits: 515
Page Views: 2,978
Ad Revenue: $1.74
Overall eCPM: $0.19
Google Page Rank: 2/10
Alexa Rank: 123,024 (so skewed)

Alexa Graph:

RMX Direct Advertiser Report: (click to enlarge)untitled-1.jpg

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Scrybe Reminds Me Why I Love the Web

I have no idea if new productivity application Scrybe will ge as good as people say and as it looks in the video below, but watching the video reminded me of why I love the web.

It’s such a fantastic platform for building tools quickly that can help people work, educate, interact, and entertain in better ways. It ‘s also great to see companies you’ve never heard of pop up out of nowhere and create cool applications.

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • email
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Web Analytics