Posts filed under 'Publishing'
Look at the graph above. It’s a selection of some of the top podcasting sites, and over the last year according to Alexa there is essentially no growth for any of these sites. Podcasting is flat.
First, let me clarify that those sites and many others are a mix of both audio and video podcasting, so I think they all have a future, but I think audio podcasting is not going to go anywhere and that the businesses around podcasting should be looking at video as their future.
Why do I think audio podcasting is flat and doesn’t have any future?
1. It’s hard to scan quickly.
How do I quickly scan a podcast to see if it’s worth listening to like I can skim an article?
2. It’s hard to link to a specific point in a podcast.
Technology can change this, and maybe it will soon, but if I want to directly link to a specific section of a podcast, I can’t do it.
3. Downloading and managing the files sucks.
I like RSS feeds, it’s a great way to consume content. But when I subscribe to a podcasting feed it sucks that my Ipod gets jammed up with files that I never end up hearing. Why don’t I hear them? See point #1 above.
4. Amateur podcasting is hard to take.
Sure, there is lots of amateur blogging and video that is enjoyable, but it’s easier to manage and consume. I don’t want to dedicate 20 minutes of listening time to a podcast to determine it’s as bad as I thought it was.
5. Audio advertising isn’t moving quickly.
I’m in the advertising business and work at developing and following new technology and initiatives, and everyone is talking about video, building out video solutions, and pushing video. There is very little talk and buzz about audio advertising solutions and sales of it. Even Google’s attempts after their acquisition of dMarc haven’t been successful.
As Mark Cuban pointed out back in 2005 by comparing podcasting to streaming radio, the big business model just isn’t there. There will be those who can make some cash and make it a labor of love, but it’s not a big business. As an example, one of the best audio sites, and as this blog post mentions one of the only ones to have any success in generating any growth, Odeo, is on the sales block because the company that created it is moving on to other things. If the site growing the most is up for sale, how are the other ones doing? Yikes.
Not to mention Google Trends seems to show podcasting queries declining.
Video podcasting on the other hand, which I’d just call video blogging (vlogging) or just creating themed videos like Ask a Ninja, ZeFrank, and Rocketboom, does have a bright future. Why is this? Video is more interesting. We like to see people why we hear them. It’s why people watch TV and movies now while sitting at home instead of listening to the radio. Video can be scanned easier. Video ads pay well and everyone is moving in that direction.
I hope the podcasting companies out there with flat traffic over the last year are working on video fast and furious.
March 19th, 2007
There’s so much focus in the blog and infoproduct world on creating “quick and easy” moneymaking websites. While it is possible to make quick websites that make money (although it’s much harder than people claim), I’d love to see more instruction like this from Andrew Johnson about steps to take to create a top notch content website.
As he states up front, it takes work, perhaps a lot of work, but the rewards can be much greater. And I think people who set out to create a great quality website will have a much greater chance for success than those who are trying to aim to make a quick buck.
I speak from experience on this one in that I have created a couple of large and successful content websites, and it did take a ton of work. However, if you’re passionate about the subject, that work is fun. It wasn’t a necessarily a lot of tricky knowledge that I had, it was that I worked hard to create good content for years, grew a forum, did tons of online and offline marketing, and made it a real business and focus.
On the other hand, I’ve also created “quick” websites, and the success rate was much lower.
It’s only part 1 of a 6 part series, so it’ll be fun to see what Andrew brings out next for advice. His advice so far is right on the money.
March 14th, 2007
Valleywag and others are reporting that data and anecdotes are leaking out reporting that Facebook is a terribly performing advertising buy.
Without more detail, it’s tough to really draw too many conclusions here. It’s not surprising that a social network filled with generally poor college kids doesn’t generate a lot of clicks and conversions, so I think it’d be more interesting to know some other aspects.
What are the advertisers in question pitching?
What type of creatives are the advertisers using?
What type of optimization are the advertisers using?
What type of optimization is Facebook using on their own inventory?
We know Facebook has a deal with Microsoft to represent their inventory, but I’m not aware of what technology Facebook is using to get the best yield possible out of their inventory. The Valleywag piece mentions that Myspace has been performing over twice as well as Facebook with a somewhat similar audience. What’s the difference?
Myspace could potentially be managing their advertising better, doing better user targeting, better optimization, using better yield management, and finding easy ways to work with more buyers for their inventory.
Additionally, Myspace makes a lot of their ads very hard to miss, while the majority (if not all) of Facebook’s ads are below the fold. This difference alone is going to affect performance.
It’d be great to know the details of the setups to truly compare, but at this point it sounds like Facebook may need to try and do some things to keep some of their ad buyers around.
March 7th, 2007
On March 10th in Austin I’ll be on the Online Publishers and Ad Networks panel at SXSW.
The panel will be moderated by publisher Jonathan Weber of NewWest.net, and will have me representing Right Media and the ad exchange market, Cody Simms of the Yahoo Publisher Network representing the contextual network market, Larry Allen of Tacoda covering behavioral targeting and ad networks, and Justin Ward from Feedburner covering RSS advertising.
Hopefully it will be educational and worthwhile, I know I’m looking forward to it. I’ve never been to SXSW, so I’m anxious to check out many of the other sessions and speakers as well.
February 25th, 2007
We’ve got Technorati, Alexa, and other various traffic or ranking services that help us quantify and rank blogs and give us something to talk about. Unfortunately, these servcies all rank with different criteria such as the number of links from other blogs, traffic based on a toolbar install, traffic estimates based on a panel, or something else entirely. Additionally, it’s not always that useful in context of your actual industry. What’s more useful to know, that my blog is #53,294 in Alexa or that it’s the 9th ranked blog in it’s niche?
Because of this, I’ve decided to compile a list of blogs that I call the “Web Revenue Blogs”, look up their rankings in various services, compile them, and then rank them accordingly. I
| classify a blog as a “Web Revenue Blog” if the primary focus of the blog is helping people make money through a blog or website.
|
What is a “Web Revenue Blog”?
Blogs that focus on affiliate marketing, display advertising, contextual advertising, and actually helping people generate revenue in these ways by running their own site. This blog is a good example, as well as others in the list.
I’ve intentionally left out company blogs in this area like the YPN Blog, Inside Adsense, and others. I’ve also left out blogs that really just only cover news, or blogs that are really heavy on search engine news and optimization tips. The blogs in these rankings spend a lot of their time talking about making money from a website or blog.
Why make these rankings?
As I mentioned above, I don’t think any one service shows the whole picture. I was also interested to see how my blog stacked up agains the competition, and wanted to motivate myself. Additionally, I think this will help people find some good blogs that they can learn from, and it’s good to study these bloggers as the top ones are doing many things right.
How are the rankings calculated?
These rankings are a way to just calculate which blogs are the most popular and have the most influence in this industry. Therefore, I decided to try and find a way to combine link quantity, link authority, and actual site traffic. I took data from numerous sources, and then gave each blog a score for their ranking in that category. So if a blog was #1 in Alexa rank, they received a score of “1” for that category. Then I averaged the scores across each data source to get an average score, and ranked the blogs in that order. I think it’d also be valuable to combine RSS subscribers into the rankings, but not all of the bloggers in the rankings publish their Feedburner subscriber count.
Is this perfect? No, and I’d be happy to hear comments on other data I should include or ways to change the formula.
The following is the data sources and why they were included:
Technorati Ranking – Provides the number of links from blogs to other blogs, and is the most commonly referred to blog ranking system. It relies on quantity of links from other blogs combined with the number of blogs doing the actual linking.
Alexa – Measures the number of visitors to a site based on Alexa toolbar installations on people’s computers. The data tends to favor the type of blogs we’re ranking, but can be easily skewed and is more accurate for the most popular sites out there.
Compete – Uses the number of unique visitors to a site based on USA visitors only. This data is also based on a panel like Comscore. Unfortunately this data is for the the USA audience only. It also only attempts to rank the top one million sites, and a few of the blogs in these rankings had no data in Compete.
Quantcast – A newer entry to the data sites, Quantcast measures site traffic by analyzing data provided by ISPs and various partners. They also allow website owners to put their code on your site so they can more accurately report your data. They also provide some other cool data about your site if you do this, and it can be very handy if you need to provide demographics to advertisers. A few blogs in these rankings also had no Quantcast data, so I’d recommend they ad the Quantcast code to make sure they get ranked.
Google Pagerank – Yes, I know Pagerank is just a number and doesn’t mean anything, but I think everyone can also agree that a site with a pagerank of 7/10 has a higher link authority than a site that has a 4/10. What that means for search results is irrelevant for these rankings, it’s more of a way to try and get some link authority into our data.
Yahoo Links – Google’s “link:” command doesn’t provide a full set of data, and we’re using Pagerank already, so I used Yahoo! Search to get a more full set of links to a site. Why do this when we have Technorati? Well, Technorati is only tracking blog links, while Yahoo is getting links from any type of site.
Now that’s past us, let’s get on to the rankings. I’m sure there are a ton of blogs not listed here that should be. I compiled this list as they are blogs I read or that I knew were some of the most popular. If you know of a blog that should be included, add it in the comments and I’ll compile the data.
Web Revenue Blog Rankings
You can see the raw data with the actual rankings from each service here.
Interesting Notes
Darren Rowse and ProBlogger was far and away the winner as the site with the best rankingt in 4 of the 6 categories, and was second in the other two. The only blog with a Google Page Rank of 7/10, one of the two Technorati Top 100 members (Shoemoney being the other), and his 437,368 Yahoo links was way ahead of the #2 which was ShoeMoney with 53,173.
A few of the sites benefit from having content beyond a normal blog which probably helps in a few of the different rankings. Those sites are Shawn Collins Affiliate Tip, TamingTheBeast.net, 5 Star Affiliate, WebsitePublisher.net, and Make Easy Money With Google Adsense.
Even though LeeDodd.com comes up at the bottom of the rankings, I expect it to be a fast mover up the list. He already has a presence in the community with EarnersForum and the Elite Retreat events, and his blog is very new but is moving up in Alexa fast.
Various sites didn’t show up in one of the ratings services, so you’ll see them tied with their score in the categories above. For JoelComm.com and Make Money With Adsense they could easily claim their blogs in Technorati to get listed their rankings, and for the blogs not in Quantcast they could add the Quantcast code to their page to get ranked.
When will the next rankings be released?
I think I’ll update these rankings as much as it makes sense. I expect new blogs to join the rankings, but I won’t publish new rankings unless there is decent movement within the rankings. There isn’t much of a point to do it each month if there is very little change. I’ll check again in a month to see if it make sense to update the rankings.
Feedback is welcome on how to improve these rankings and what blogs should be included that aren’t here now.
|
February 19th, 2007
I always enjoy posts from bloggers where they mention the top tools or resources they use to master whatever it is they are an expert in. Along those lines, I thought it’d be a good dea to pass along the list of the top ad tools I use and know of to help web publishers and bloggers make more money.
The basic assumption for these tools to be useful to you is that you run a blog or website that uses advertising to make money whether that advertising is sold directly by you, through an ad network, or you use a contextual solution like Google Adsense or YPN. Some of them are very direct in how they help make more money, and some of them are helpful tools that provide information to help you make more money from your advertising. For the most part they are free tools with a couple of exceptions.
CrazyEgg
Self-described as a visualization tool to improve, test, and track your site, CrazyEgg is best used for publishers to generate “heatmaps” of where people are clicking on their site. This data can be used to make better decisions on where to place ads to get more clicks and response from users. CrazyEgg allows you to set up tests so you can effectively test the difference between two different ad sizes in the same spot, two different color palettes, or totally changing an ad’s location.
It’s easy to setup, it just requires signing up for an account and placing some code in your page footer. You then create a test and start tracking clicks. The free version allows you to track up to 5,000 visits and track 4 different pages at once. There are paid plans if you want to do more in-depth tests.
RMX Direct
If you’re working with ad networks, you should be working with RMX Direct. RMX Direct is a free ad network manager that helps you sell your inventory easily and for maximum revenue. It allows you to work with networks directly that are part of the Right Media Exchange, as well as auction your own ad networks like Google Adsense, YPN, Valueclick, Tribal Fusion, or anyone else.
Auctioning your inventory is the best way to maximize your revenue, and RMX Direct has other cool features that make managing ad networks a much better process. Check out a previous post about using it manage contextual ad networks.
Feedburner
If you run a blog or a website with RSS, you need to be running your RSS feed(s) through Feedburner. There are numerous benefits alone in the streamlining, analyzing, and optimizing of RSS feeds by using Feedburner, but if you have enough subscribers it’s an ad revenue stream as well. If I wasn’t consolidating and tracking my RSS subscribers through my Feedburner feed, I probably would have never bothered advertising within my feed. Feedburner makes it extremely easy to advertise in your feed once you hit 500 subscribers, so I’m now just making additional revenue without additional work. Bravo.
AdsBlackList
If you’re using Google Adsense, you should be using AdsBlackList. It’s a site that compiles user submissions of sites that are “Made For Adsense” sites and low cost per click advertisers. When you sign up for an account, it has you enter your site and some keywords about it. It then returns a list of “Made for Adsense” and low cost per click advertisers you can then ban from showing ads on your site. Besides probably helping increase the quality of ads, you’re also hurting the distribution of a lot of junk in Google’s system. I have not run specific tests on if the overall revenue per click goes up after banning their suggested lists, but other publishers have reported good results.
Google Analytics
Yes, it has performance issues. Yes, there is a lag time before you get your data. Yes, it’s Google. However, Google Analytics is still the most complete free web analytics tool out there. For this article, the benefit of Google Analytics as it relates to ad revenue is that you need to analyze your traffic and find out what type of content is interesting to them, what keywords are they using to find you, what referring sites are there, and what geography your users from.
Armed with that data you can now make decisions. Can you identify an underserved area of your site that users are interested in? Interested users means more page views which equals more money! Do you have a lot of visitors from a foreign country? Perhaps it’d be good to sign up with an ad network based in that country and geotarget it to those users with a tool like RMX Direct? You can’t make smart decisions without data, and Google Analytics provides it for free.
Amigo
For those of you who are still signing up users for email newsletters, Amigo operates much like an ad network except it’s a tool for email advertising. Sign up with Amigo and they’ll match ads and stick ads into your email newsletters earning you additional revenue. If you don’t have an email newsletter, maybe it’s time to start one?
Google Adwords Keyword Tool
I know this tool is meant for Adwords advertisers, but it can be a great way for publishers to find out what search phrases are paying a lot per click if they’re using Adsense or YPN. Click on the “Site-related Keywords” tab, and enter in the URL of a site in the topic you’d like to research. Check the “Include other pages on my site linked from this URL” box, then select “Cost and Ad Position Estimates”, and enter something large like $50.00. You’ll get a result that shows keywords along with an estimate of the CPC they require to get to the estimated ad position.
This is a rough way to find out what topics and terms are generating high revenue per click to focus your content. You can also get estimates of search volume and search volume trends if you’re curious as to how the keywords in the topic stack up there.
Yahoo/Overture Keyword Tool
The famous Yahoo/Overture tool returns keywords that contain the keyword you enter, along with the number of searches on Yahoo Search from the previous month. Many question the accuracy of this data as some strange terms sometimes have really high search counts, but regardless it can be a good estimate of search volume and provides a way to brainstorm additional topics to cover to get more traffic and ad revenue. It also provides a good counterbalance if you’re using the Google Adwords Keyword Tool. If a keyword looks interesting to you in both tools, chances are it’s an interesting keyword in reality.
Quantcast
A newer and very cool data/ranking service is out called Quantcast. Quantcast “quantifies” publisher sites and provides an Alexa-like traffic estimate and ranking, but takes it a step further and provides demographic estimates of your audience such as age, gender, household income, ethnicity, and education.
It doesn’t stop there either, and shows interesting things like “Siteographics” which shows what entertainment the audience likes, what retail stores they shop at, and what magazines they check out. It also shows what keywords they used and what other sites are similar in audience. Here is the Quantcast data for YouTube.com.
Why is this cool? Well, once you start selling advertising on your site directly to advertisers, they are often interested in demographic data. The beauty of Quantcast is that they’ll get the data for you and you can point advertisers to this objective third party that has the data. If your site is big enough, they probably already have you listed. If not, you “Quantify” your site by placing a bit of code in the footer of your site template and it will start grabbing the data.
SurveyMonkey
If you don’t trust Quantcast or want your own specific data, you can use SurveyMonkey to create surveys you can show to your audience via popup windows or direct link. It’s a free service, and is pretty easy to use to setup surveys and distribute them.
Just like the benefits of Quantcast, this is great data to provide to advertisers about your audience, and SurveyMonkey results make a great addition to your online media kit or page that pitches advertising on your site.
Webmaster Forums
While not specifically a tool, I felt it necessary to point out some of the top discussion forums where there are web publishers talking about advertising and how to make more money. In no particular order here are ones that I’ve found value in on a consistent basis:
Conclusion
If you have additional tools to suggest, please list them below in the comments. If they make sense, I’ll add them to the list.
February 13th, 2007
Over the last few years contextual ad networks such as the Yahoo Publisher Network and Google Adsense have become powerhouses in the publisher advertising world. Even though ad servers were around long before these networks, many publishers and bloggers don’t bother using ad servers when working with them.
Part of the reason is they make it pretty easy to just slap their ad code on your site and get going, however that’s EXACTLY what they want you to do because then they own all access to that inventory. It can really help you dominate with contextual ad networks if you use an ad server in the ways listed below. Note: RMX Direct is the example ad server being used because it’s free, does all these things, and is the ad server I’m most familiar with at the moment. However, many of these concepts will work with other ad serving options.
1. Set Frequency Caps
Frequency capping is when you specify that you want to only allow a certain advertiser or ad network to receive a set number of impressions over a time period per user. For example, you could specify that you only want to show 10 Adsense impressions per hour per user. The rest of the impressions they’d get could be YPN, or other ad networks you may be working with. Why do this? The main reason is that if you just always show Adsense, the same ads are often shown throughout your site. If a user hasn’t clicked on any after a certain number of impressions, it may help to show YPN ads that have different ads, or YPN ads with a different visual look, or maybe even show CPM display ads.
2. Manage Multiple Color Palettes
With the recent Adsense policy changes requiring competing networks to have ads that have a different visual “look”, an ad server can make it easier to manage multiple color palettes. As mentioned above you can use frequency capping to run different visual looks, but you can also easily manage the delivery of those visual looks by creating multiple campaigns/placements in an ad server that can easily be turned on or off, and have the details adjusted.
3. Combat Smart Pricing
I’m not entirely sure if YPN has “Smart Pricing”, but with AdSense if you are serving ads across multiple websites and one of the websites has clicks not converting as well as others, that website will drag down your revenue per click as a whole. See more information on “Smart Pricing” here or here. Many publishers who realize this and deactivate Adsense from their poorly performing sites see an increase in click payouts due to smart pricing. With RMX Direct, if you suspect that one of your websites may be hurting your overall revenue per click due to Smart Pricing, you can stop serving AdSense ads to that site with the click of a button. There is no need to take down ad code off the site since it’s controlled through the ad server. Then you can also turn it back on with the click of a button, switch it to YPN ads, or do something else with it. It’s much easier and quicker than jockeying code around all over the place.
4. Track Impressions From Multiple Networks In One Spot
One thing that’s always annoying about working with multiple ad networks is having to login to multiple reporting systems to get data. With RMX Direct or another ad server, you can see your impressions for YPN and AdSense all in one place. Unfortunately, at this point most ad servers can’t show revenue data because the amount paid per click varies. As Adsense and YPN move more forward with APIs, we’ll probably see more ad servers finding ways to import that data as well.
5. Work Display Advertising Into The Mix
Users can become blind to contextual text advertisements, which can result in low click-through rates meaning poor revenue for you. Why not put some guaranteed revenue in your pocket by adding CPM display advertisements into the mix? RMX Direct takes that idea one step further beyond normal ad servers, as it has display networks built into the product to apply to and work with easily. They will compete with the prices of your contextual ad networks, making it a guarantee you’ll only earn more revenue. Competition is a beautiful thing.
But what about the “low” quality of many graphic ads? Excuse the sales pitch, but RMX Direct also has a tool called Media Guard that allows for insane control of the characteristics of ads you don’t want appearing on your site.
6. Analyze Geographic Distribution of Ads
The reporting systems of the contextual networks don’t give any geographical breakdown of where your ad impressions are coming from. Knowing this information can help you make decisions on the type of content you create, or if it makes sense to geotarget your ads. If you found out today that 70% of your ad impressions were coming from Europe, it might make sense to create more content for that audience. You can also set up channels with contextual networks and test using different color palettes in different countries to see the results. Different cultures feel different ways about various colors, it wouldn’t be surprising if users from different countries respond to ads differently.
7. Learn From Similar Publishers
This one isn’t available in most ad serving products, but one of the most powerful features of RMX Direct is our community. Sure, you can find a forum out there of AdSense or YPN publishers, but can you find a forum of people who are using both, plus a number of other ad networks at the same time? Our forum is full of publishers just like you who have been there and done that. Ask them for advice, they’ll be happy to help (as will the RMX Direct support staff).
8. Get RSS Reports of Impressions and Revenue Estimations
Building upon the idea of tracking impressions from multiple ad networks in one spot, some ad servers feature RSS reporting so you can get your stats right in your RSS reader. Again, with the contextual networks, at this point only the number of impressions shown can accurately be reported, along with an estimation of revenue if you’re using RMX Direct. But if you’re using the display networks in RMX Direct, it’s very handy to get the real revenue statistics through RSS.
9. Work With As Many Networks As You Can Handle
If your website doesn’t have much traffic, then you don’t need to work with many ad networks. However, if you get a decent amount of traffic and take advertising seriously, you should definitely work with as many ad networks as it makes sense for your traffic levels. To start out with, you have the ability to sign up with nine ad networks from the Right Media Exchange. However, once you start adding additional ad networks in, the sky is the limit. Work with whatever contextual networks you want. If fact, you can add networks from the whole spectrum, more display networks, more contextual networks, and even more affiliate advertisers.
10. Geotarget Your Ads
Which does better in Asia, YPN or AdSense? Want to find out? With RMX Direct, you can geotarget your advertising placements. It’s useful in a number of situations. Let me give you an example: let’s say you’ve noticed a spike in clicks from Russia and you’re worried about click fraud. The solution is simple, turn off contextual ad serving to that area with a quick click and save (if the problem is severe, please notify your ad network). As mentioned above, you can also target color palettes to specific regions, or eliminate showing contextual ads to any countries beyond the USA if you want to show different types of ads to international users. The power is in your hands.
Bonus tip: Instead of PSAs, show display ads.
With some contextual networks, you can specific what you want to do in the event a public service announcement (PSA) needs to be served. Well, don’t lose that impression and the money that comes with it, send it to an ad server like RMX Direct where you have display networks that can pay you a CPM for that impression. Simply put RMX Direct ad code into an HTML file and point the network to it. Behold, 100% fill rate for your advertising.
Conclusion
Hopefully the above tips showed that a whole new level of power is available in managing contextual networks by using an ad server. You put the control in your own hands and can use it to optimize your contextual advertising.
February 7th, 2007
Well, at least not in mass numbers.
FAST Search and Transfer, the people who brought us AllTheWeb.com, are soon to launch a product called AdMomentum that allows publishers to create their own “Adsense-like” contextual network for selling to advertisers directly, instead of sharing their spoils with Google or other contextual ad network providers.
Some are pretty excited about the idea, others like Andy Beal are don’t buy it. First, they really aren’t the first to do this as Quigo’s AdSonar and ContextWeb have been around for a few years now. Second, while the time is probably more ripe today for publishers to be ready to roll their own contextual solution for advertisers, I still don’t think the majority of the publisher world is ready to do such a thing.
There are many things I’ve learned over the past two years working heavily in the online advertising space, and three of them are important in this issue.
1. Publishers don’t want to do deal with advertising.
Publishers for the most part want to focus on publishing their sites. They aren’t experts in advertising, they don’t always like advertising, and they only deal with it because they need to pay the bills and they want to grow the revenue generated from their site. I’m generalizing a bit here, but I think it holds pretty true in general. Even if they are knowledgeable and excited about advertising, they really don’t want to deal with much of the complexity involved. They just want to make as much money as they possibly can with the least amount of hassle.
While I haven’t yet seen the AdMomentum platform, it sounds to me like it will take work on the publisher side, and anytime you’re selling to advertisers directly that’s the case. AdMomentum will have to be extremely easy to use for it to be an easier process than signing up for an ad network, pasting some code, and cashing your check.
2. There is a lot of value in ad networks.
This is partially true based on what I just said about publishers not wanting to deal with hassle. Often ad networks are the ones dealing with the hassle. They optimize the campaigns, they aggregate creatives, they host the data and serve the ads, they eat the bandwidth costs, they find the advertisers, they deal with the advertisers, they bill the advertisers, they collect from the advertisers, they pay the publisher, etc. Publishers often wonder and complain about ad networks taking such a big cut. The reality is that ad networks do a lot of work and provide value. Many people I’ve talked to over the past couple of years have wondered if what we do at Right Media threatens the ad network business since we aim to make online advertising more efficient and many see networks as middlemen. The reality is that the networks provide value, and sometimes when you put the advertisers and publishers directly in contact with each other, things work out worse than if you have a network managing the process and taking their cut in the middle.
3. Very few publishers get direct advertisers.
It’s the dream of many publishers out there to have mobs of advertisers beating down their doors to directly advertiser on their site. The reality is that really only the top 5% of publishers ever sell direct advertising. Generally, in order to sell direct advertising you need to either have a lot of traffic, or be one of the leading sites with a great name in your industry. Maybe this is who the AdMomentum program is made for, but those top publishers are already in bed with a lot of people, and one or more of the contextual networks is often one of them. Ad networks provide advertisers to publishers. Advertisers they’d never get otherwise. Does Google take a nice cut? Sure they do, but they bring the publishers a heck of a lot more advertisers than that publisher would ever get on their own. Plus, a smart publisher will sell everything that they can direct anyway (they probably already are), and then use ad networks to fill the rest.
It’s these three reasons that I don’t think AdMomentum from Fast will have much uptake. Running your own show as a publisher takes work, hassle, and the ad networks bring more value than people usually realize.
February 5th, 2007
As a recent post by Robert Young at GigaOm brings up, was Facebook “Smart or Stupid” by not taking a buyout offer in 2006?
Traffic is up according to Alexa, so one might think they made the right move and are worth more today than they were in 2006. And what’s not to think that traffic won’t keep going up as there are more college students every year, and now that Facebook is open to non-college students they can stick around after graduating.
However, what good is that traffic if you can’t monetize it well? Robert Young’s piece reports that Facebook isn’t having a ton of luck in this area. If this is true, I see two things happening over 2007. First, they’ll prove that it’s hard to monetize their traffic extremely well, as has really been the case with social networking traffic thus far. And second, social networking won’t be as hot as it was in 2006 when it was really the new and exciting kid on the block. Once those two things happen, will those huge buyout offers still exist? Probably not.
Of course, there are a lot of companies and people working on monetizing social network traffic better, so it’s quite possible that strides are made there. And if Facebook continues to grow and dominate their space, then maybe. But the numbers being thrown around in 2006 were pretty high, so I think they may regret not taking one of those deals when it’s all said and done.
February 5th, 2007
We’ve just completed another featured publisher interview at RMX Direct. Read on for more about Star Media Group and how they use RMX Direct to improve their ad monetization on their online radio sites.
Star Media Group Inc. is a conglomerate of online radio stations that span a number of genres. These stations include www.star104.net, www.club977.com, www.977music.com, www.kmgx.com, www.oldiesradionet.com, www.radiostorm.com, www.club977hitz.com, and www.rdl101.com. Jamie Davis is the President of Star Media Group Inc., and he is our new Featured Publisher.
—-
Vince Panero (VP): How did you get interested in web publishing originally? What were those early days like for you?
Jamie Davis: We started in internet radio years back and were looking for a way to monetize our listener traffic. Audio ads were still new and not very popular as of yet, so we looked to image and banner advertising on a CPM basis. The first months were rough and low in earnings, but after a few months, everything just sort of took off, and we found ourselves growing our revenue every month. It’s been great ever since.
VP: Can you tell us about your online radio-focused website? Having this focus, are there any particular issues exclusive to your site that you had to overcome to make the advertising model work?
Jamie Davis: Our website (websites actually, we operate 3 sub-portals of stations under our parent corporation) consists of several online-only radio station webcasts, each predominantly windows media based. It is imperative that our sites run banner advertising that is parallel to the type of audience we draw in. It’s been tough at times to accomplish that goal, as some of our advertisers have simply thrown any old ad up there without specifically targeting our demographics. RMX Direct has helped with that by providing targeted ads along with the use of their Media Guard system to prevent unwanted ads from being shown. We’ve also had some problems in the past with getting the most money for our inventory. RMX Direct also solves this problem with the bid-based system they utilize.
VP: Did you get into this with the idea that you would make ad dollars from this site? How did you initially monetize your site? What problems did you encounter utilizing these early methods?
Jamie Davis: Originally, webcasting was simply something I enjoyed as a hobby, and eventually, it became more of a full-time job and I was happy to be able to do what I liked to do. Initially, we didn’t really monetize our site; most of our DJs were just in it for the thrill of internet radio and having an audience listening to their picks. After a while, bandwidth became an issue, and we turned to some sort of advertising revenue. We started out with audio ads, but during our first days, times were tough because audio advertising was still very new to the market, and internet radio was pretty new itself. After a while, we decided banner-based ads were the way to go.
VP: Why did you start using RMX Direct as your ad network management system of choice?
Jamie Davis: RMX Direct allows us to rotate our outside publishing accounts in their system and eliminates the need for us to have to install and utilize our own system, such as phpAds or AdJuggler. These systems, with our amount of web traffic, can heavily tax our web server and cause downtime after a few hours of heavy traffic. We can rotate our current accounts in RMX Direct, while at the same time allowing the RMX networks to compete and outbid for our inventory. It really helps us monetize our traffic on a new level, both by keeping our overhead down, and increasing our overall revenue.
VP: What statistical changes have you seen since you started using it? For example, have your eCPM and revenue increased?
Jamie Davis: Our eCPMs as a whole, across our entire inventory measurement, have increased by at least 20%. Our revenue has also increased along the same lines thanks to this. We’ve noticed that much more of our traffic has been monetized, and less defaults and PSAs have been shown across all our advertising accounts.
VP: What do you like most about RMX Direct? Are there helpful parts of it that other ad management interfaces simply don’t offer? And how does it address the specific needs of being an online radio-focused website?
Jamie Davis: I really enjoy RMX’s overall administrative platform. When I log in to the system, I can not only view revenue for the day, but I can also easily rotate all of my ad engines into the mix and set up a rotation I prefer, based on geo-targeting, eCPM, frequency, etc. It really eliminates a lot of the hassle of having to install and administer my own rotation system. No other ad management interface I’ve seen does this as effectively. It really allows us, as an online radio web portal, to manage our ad placements effectively and easily. Our revenue enjoys the benefits of this.
VP: Do you have any tips or tricks that you think others using the exchange might find useful?
Jamie Davis: There are really no tricks to this, but I do have one tip. Keep your eCPMs for your outside networks updated at least weekly. I update ours on a weekly basis, and it really helps our revenue grow. Don’t just set a general CPM and sit and wait, or everything suffers. Keep everything updated on a consistent basis.
VP: Do you have any final thoughts on this “exchange concept” (network transparency and competition, the utility of having just one login, etc.)?
Jamie Davis: This new ad exchange platform has revolutionized everything in the online advertising world as far as I’m concerned. If we could get all of our networks to join into this system, I don’t think I’d have quite as many problems as I have when it comes to running the technical aspects and financial aspects of our company.
VP: Thanks for being a member of RMX Direct, Jamie.
February 2nd, 2007
Next Posts
Previous Posts
