<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Moves to Behavioral Targeting, Will They Acquire Help?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/</link>
	<description>A discussion of ecommerce, online advertising, Web 2.0, web entrepreneurship, and just making the web convert for your goals.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:52:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Napaspa</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/comment-page-1/#comment-46723</link>
		<dc:creator>Napaspa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/#comment-46723</guid>
		<description>IMHO behavioral targeting hasn&#039;t &quot;taken off&quot; because the premium the networks try to charge is not justified by the resulting  performance.

If companies like Tacoda/Tribal/Valueclick/24/7 charged an appropriate premium tied to conversion lift over RON for thier targeted inventory, I&#039;d use them instead of running larger RON campaings at lower rates. After testing a number of networks (including right media) perfomance lift was never what they claimed it would be. This caused me to loose faith in their claims/technology.

In my experience Yahoo, Advertising.com &amp; MSN (MSN has had some behavior targeting for 2 years at least) targeted inventory is more appropriately priced and makes more sense (and is more scalable.) 

I&#039;ve never worked with revenue science because of how they built thier network.  You never mentioned Claria, WhenU or AWS for that matter. What about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">IMHO</span> behavioral targeting hasn&#8217;t &#8220;taken off&#8221; because the premium the networks try to charge is not justified by the resulting  performance.</p>
<p>If companies like Tacoda/Tribal/Valueclick/24/7 charged an appropriate premium tied to conversion lift over <span class="caps">RON</span> for thier targeted inventory, I&#8217;d use them instead of running larger <span class="caps">RON</span> campaings at lower rates. After testing a number of networks (including right media) perfomance lift was never what they claimed it would be. This caused me to loose faith in their claims/technology.</p>
<p>In my experience Yahoo, Advertising.com &#038; <span class="caps">MSN </span>(MSN has had some behavior targeting for 2 years at least) targeted inventory is more appropriately priced and makes more sense (and is more scalable.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never worked with revenue science because of how they built thier network.  You never mentioned Claria, WhenU or <span class="caps">AWS</span> for that matter. What about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>