
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Moves to Behavioral Targeting, Will They Acquire Help?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/</link>
	<description>A discussion of ecommerce, online advertising, Web 2.0, web entrepreneurship, and just making the web convert for your goals.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Napaspa</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/#comment-46723</link>
		<dc:creator>Napaspa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/12/31/microsoft-moves-to-behavioral-targeting-will-they-acquire-help/#comment-46723</guid>
		<description>IMHO behavioral targeting hasn't "taken off" because the premium the networks try to charge is not justified by the resulting  performance.

If companies like Tacoda/Tribal/Valueclick/24/7 charged an appropriate premium tied to conversion lift over RON for thier targeted inventory, I'd use them instead of running larger RON campaings at lower rates. After testing a number of networks (including right media) perfomance lift was never what they claimed it would be. This caused me to loose faith in their claims/technology.

In my experience Yahoo, Advertising.com &#38; MSN (MSN has had some behavior targeting for 2 years at least) targeted inventory is more appropriately priced and makes more sense (and is more scalable.) 

I've never worked with revenue science because of how they built thier network.  You never mentioned Claria, WhenU or AWS for that matter. What about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="caps">IMHO</span> behavioral targeting hasn&#8217;t &#8220;taken off&#8221; because the premium the networks try to charge is not justified by the resulting  performance.</p>
<p>If companies like Tacoda/Tribal/Valueclick/24/7 charged an appropriate premium tied to conversion lift over <span class="caps">RON</span> for thier targeted inventory, I&#8217;d use them instead of running larger <span class="caps">RON</span> campaings at lower rates. After testing a number of networks (including right media) perfomance lift was never what they claimed it would be. This caused me to loose faith in their claims/technology.</p>
<p>In my experience Yahoo, Advertising.com &#038; <span class="caps">MSN </span>(MSN has had some behavior targeting for 2 years at least) targeted inventory is more appropriately priced and makes more sense (and is more scalable.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never worked with revenue science because of how they built thier network.  You never mentioned Claria, WhenU or <span class="caps">AWS</span> for that matter. What about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
