<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Pageviews Obsolete?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/</link>
	<description>A discussion of online advertising, web entrepreneurship, and personal ramblings from Pat McCarthy..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wabkmbokfx</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-127214</link>
		<dc:creator>wabkmbokfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-127214</guid>
		<description>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! hxluzihbdeksd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! hxluzihbdeksd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-11267</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-11267</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff,

Did you post a comment that didn&#039;t show up on the site?  I don&#039;t recall deleting any comment from you?  I really enjoy your comments and your blog and writing.

Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff,</p>
<p>Did you post a comment that didn&#8217;t show up on the site?  I don&#8217;t recall deleting any comment from you?  I really enjoy your comments and your blog and writing.</p>
<p>Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-11266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-11266</guid>
		<description>Pat:
I cannot find another means to communicate with you so I am forced to use this form.

I am wondering why you chose to not accept my comment here.  I find your commentary and insights to be rather unique and have passed the URL around lately to respected colleagues.

Are my comments somehow off the mark?

Thanks,
Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat:<br />
I cannot find another means to communicate with you so I am forced to use this form.</p>
<p>I am wondering why you chose to not accept my comment here.  I find your commentary and insights to be rather unique and have passed the URL around lately to respected colleagues.</p>
<p>Are my comments somehow off the mark?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-11183</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-11183</guid>
		<description>Well, that depends on goals.  Many people like blogs because you can read a lot of content all on one page.  In that case blogs are pretty usable.

However, if you&#039;re running ads where the number of ad impressions matters in how much you&#039;re paid, then blogs tend to not generate many page views which means bloggers are leaving some money on the table.

So, I&#039;m not really trying to say one idea or the other is right, I&#039;m just saying that for some people page views are still a very important metric because it ties directly to revenue.  And that while many consider Myspace a failure for the huge amounts of unneccessary page views, I think Myspace is happy that those page views generate revenue and don&#039;t really seem to cost them much of their core audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that depends on goals.  Many people like blogs because you can read a lot of content all on one page.  In that case blogs are pretty usable.</p>
<p>However, if you&#8217;re running ads where the number of ad impressions matters in how much you&#8217;re paid, then blogs tend to not generate many page views which means bloggers are leaving some money on the table.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m not really trying to say one idea or the other is right, I&#8217;m just saying that for some people page views are still a very important metric because it ties directly to revenue.  And that while many consider Myspace a failure for the huge amounts of unneccessary page views, I think Myspace is happy that those page views generate revenue and don&#8217;t really seem to cost them much of their core audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbin Steif</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-11182</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbin Steif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 20:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-11182</guid>
		<description>Pat, I don&#039;t do MySpace except to spy on my kids. And I still don&#039;t know much about it (I guess I won&#039;t be applying for a job at the CIA any time soon.)  But isn&#039;t part of the &quot;problem&quot; the efficiency of page views in a blog (any blog, not just blogger), whereby the home page may include 10, 20, 30 posts, the equivalent of that many pages?

Robbin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I don&#8217;t do MySpace except to spy on my kids. And I still don&#8217;t know much about it (I guess I won&#8217;t be applying for a job at the CIA any time soon.)  But isn&#8217;t part of the &#8220;problem&#8221; the efficiency of page views in a blog (any blog, not just blogger), whereby the home page may include 10, 20, 30 posts, the equivalent of that many pages?</p>
<p>Robbin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molander</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-11166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 15:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/08/28/are-pageviews-obsolete/#comment-11166</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts.  

I was just alerted via email by LinkedIn (apparently this is a recent decision they made... check the results out http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&amp;compare_sites=&amp;y=p&amp;q=&amp;size=medium&amp;range=2y&amp;url=http://www.linkedin.com/)... to open themselves up to the Web (search engine indexes).  

Message from LinkedIn:

&quot;Odds are people searching for you on Google aren&#039;t always finding the real you. Take charge of your personal brand by publishing your LinkedIn profile to the web.&quot;

HA!  How can one say no to that?  Somehow I managed to.  I use LinkedIn specifically for the purpose of not being &quot;mass&quot; about my network and/or myself.  IMO, this is a mistake for LinkedIn -- but then again I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll be rewarded financially for this move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts.  </p>
<p>I was just alerted via email by LinkedIn (apparently this is a recent decision they made&#8230; check the results out <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&#038;compare_sites=&#038;y=p&#038;q=&#038;size=medium&#038;range=2y&#038;url=http://www.linkedin.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&#038;compare_sites=&#038;y=p&#038;q=&#038;size=medium&#038;range=2y&#038;url=http://www.linkedin.com/</a>)&#8230; to open themselves up to the Web (search engine indexes).  </p>
<p>Message from LinkedIn:</p>
<p>&#8220;Odds are people searching for you on Google aren&#8217;t always finding the real you. Take charge of your personal brand by publishing your LinkedIn profile to the web.&#8221;</p>
<p>HA!  How can one say no to that?  Somehow I managed to.  I use LinkedIn specifically for the purpose of not being &#8220;mass&#8221; about my network and/or myself.  IMO, this is a mistake for LinkedIn &#8212; but then again I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be rewarded financially for this move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
