<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bashing Google, and Their Intent With Spreadsheets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/</link>
	<description>A discussion of online advertising, web entrepreneurship, and personal ramblings from Pat McCarthy..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>&gt;

Great point and one straight out of the Microsoft playbook...and that has been one of Redmond&#039;s core strengths...think initial versions of MS Windows, Excel, etc...all basically functional but not even close to optional.  

But over the last 20+ years MS consistently took the long view and their bank balance is proof of concept that the prize doesn&#039;t necessarily go to the one who comes out with the best, first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;</p>
<p>Great point and one straight out of the Microsoft playbook&#8230;and that has been one of Redmond&#8217;s core strengths&#8230;think initial versions of MS Windows, Excel, etc&#8230;all basically functional but not even close to optional.  </p>
<p>But over the last 20+ years MS consistently took the long view and their bank balance is proof of concept that the prize doesn&#8217;t necessarily go to the one who comes out with the best, first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Segu</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-5398</link>
		<dc:creator>Segu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 03:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/#comment-5398</guid>
		<description>Spreadsheet has come to reach of all internet users. So, this means, users need not shell dollars for the 20% features what most users stick to. Online spreadsheets , in one way might become very useful. 

Take a look at the online spreadsheet app. http://zohosheet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spreadsheet has come to reach of all internet users. So, this means, users need not shell dollars for the 20% features what most users stick to. Online spreadsheets , in one way might become very useful. </p>
<p>Take a look at the online spreadsheet app. <a href="http://zohosheet.com" rel="nofollow">http://zohosheet.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-5391</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/#comment-5391</guid>
		<description>Thanks Aneil, I&#039;m not sure why people take such short term views.  Obviously Google Spreadsheet is not better than Excel, and it&#039;d be hard for a web-based product to be better at this point in the web&#039;s development.

But, the web is to the point where that spreadsheet is good enough so that there will be no need for the kids of today to ever use a desktop-app spreadsheet product, unless they are doing some seriously crazy financial analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Aneil, I&#8217;m not sure why people take such short term views.  Obviously Google Spreadsheet is not better than Excel, and it&#8217;d be hard for a web-based product to be better at this point in the web&#8217;s development.</p>
<p>But, the web is to the point where that spreadsheet is good enough so that there will be no need for the kids of today to ever use a desktop-app spreadsheet product, unless they are doing some seriously crazy financial analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aneil Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.conversionrater.com/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/comment-page-1/#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>Aneil Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 21:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conversionrater.com/index.php/2006/06/07/bashing-google-and-their-intent-with-spreadsheets/#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>Fantastic reference to the four-year old daughter situation.  I think that statement alone defines why this spreadsheet is revolutionary.  The product itself is not revolutionary, but fits into a larger scope of ides/products that are and will be changing the way things are done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic reference to the four-year old daughter situation.  I think that statement alone defines why this spreadsheet is revolutionary.  The product itself is not revolutionary, but fits into a larger scope of ides/products that are and will be changing the way things are done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
